ခဏေလး ေစာင့္ေပးပါ......
  • Share this
  • Sumbit to Digg
  • Sumbit to StumbleUpon
  • Sumbit to Delicious
  • Sumbit to Technorati
  • Sumbit to Reddit
  • Sumbit to Mixx
  • Sumbit to Twitter
  • Sumbit to Furl
  • Sumbit to Design Float
  • Sumbit to Blinklist
  • Sumbit to Yahoo Buzz
  • Sumbit to Google Bookmarks

နအဖရဲ႕ ၀ါဒျဖန္႔ သတင္းစာ ေတြထဲမွာ အမ်ဳိးသမီး တစ္ဦးျဖစ္တဲ့ Virginia M Moncrieff ဆိုသူကေန အေမရိကန္မွာထုတ္ေ၀တဲ့ The Huffington Post သတင္းစာထဲက ေရးသားခ်က္ ျဖစ္တဲ့ “ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံရဲ႕ အနာဂတ္ဟာ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္နဲ႔ မပတ္သက္ႏိုင္” ဆိုတဲ့ ေဆာင္းပါးကို ျမန္မာ ဘာသာျပန္ျပီး ျပန္ေဖၚျပထားတာ ေတြ႕ရပါတယ္။

သူမဆီ တိုက္႐ိုက္ ဆက္သြယ္ရန္ လိပ္စာ
ဒီေဆာင္းပါးနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္ျပီး ျပန္လည္ တုန္႔ျပန္ေရးသား လိုရင္ေတာ့ ဒီက Comments မွာ ေရးႏိုင္ပါတယ္။


DTS said...

ဒီသတင္းနဲ႔ျမန္မာျပန္သတင္းကို ကြ်န္ေတာ့္မိတ္ေဆြ ဆရာ၀န္မ်ားဆီ ျဖန္႔ေပးခဲ့ပါတယ္။ သူတို႔က ႏိုင္ငံေရး လႈပ္ရွားမႈထဲကေတာ့ မဟုတ္ၾကပါ။ ဆရာ၀န္ေတြက ေအာက္ပါအတိုင္း ျပန္ေရးၾကပါတယ္။ မူရင္းက အဂၤလိပ္လို ျဖစ္ေနလို႔ေတာ့ ေတာင္းပန္ပါတယ္။ မေန႕က comment မွာထည့္တာ ရွာမေတြ႕လို႔ အခုထပ္ေရးပါတယ္။ ႏွစ္ခါျဖစ္သြားရင္ေတာ့ ေတာင္းပန္ပါတယ္။


1. I believe it's too premature for talking about 'turning' at this time. It's not turning that people are talking about. It's just 'capitulation' --bowing down to the ruthless oppressors not any negotiated agreement. We don't need more proof of what and how they behave. After a resounding loss in an election, they shamelessly stayed in power---how can any decent person expect any fairness from this crowd. It makes more sense to stop talking about how we or anyone did wrong, it’s more important to point out how they did wrong and how to force them to change.

As for me, I'll put my faith and trust in DASSK until we get a fair government. Anyone who proposes otherwise will be seen a power grabber for themselves or collaborator with the junta.

One aspect of a good leader is to show discipline and sacrifice and not a single person on the political scene has shown the courage or sacrifice as she is doing every single day for the last decade.

With regards,
Zaw Myint

2. It is certainly very appropriate that you put your faith in Daw Suu. Without the shadow of a doubt DASSK is one of the most selfless, altruistic, resilient and nationalistic democratic leader that Burma has ever produced. She has clearly demonstrated again and again that she is prepared to give her life for the country and the people.

KK Lay

3. Reading Virginia M. Moncrieff's The Future of Burma Cannot Be Tied to Aung San Suu Kyi, I found no word to respond. She was introduced as International Correspondent from Afghanistan.

Her story and distorted Burmese translation from NLM made many upset see:
DVB on the Aung San Suu Kyi debate http://bit.ly/ 2lxyKv and
Mizzima activists on Burma http://bit.ly/ 4bXi1O
Can any one of you write formal response?

DTS said...

4. Dr Swe has got a good suggestion. While we are at a writing mode why not send to Hillary and Laura.

5. I read V. Moncrieff's article in the Huffington Post sometime ago and it brought a taste of bile out. That is one reason I never posted it on the site. Instead I posted Russ Wellen's reply to it (Message43487) which I thought was more balanced.

Recently I've noticed a few pro-junta articles popping out from here and there in the name of changing stance and so forth. It makes one wonder whether the junta is out on the offensive with lining the pockets of a few foreign journalists to come up with articles that seem to think outside the box.

While I was preparing to come over to the UK in 1984, in Bangkok, I came across a Urology Professor (he's passed on) and his wife who were on their way back from Burma after sorting out U Ne Win's waterworks. Of course he would not comment on the state of the country even though it was a lot better compared to now. Of course he was treated like a VIP and driven around in a black limousine and so on. Also included in the trip was a few days' trip to Ngapali. Even amongst us there are a select few who get treatment like that on visiting Burma.

It is no wonder that there'll be articles like that. It's like the Chinese businessman’s approach when on being told that the new regional commander in the area is a straight guy who's not on the take. His only question to the informant was 'He eats doesn't he? '

The difference is DASSK can only eat what she's given in prison. The whole world knows it as well.


6. Dear Saya Tint Swe and all,

I think Bro Max has clearly made a point here. The article like that of V. Moncrieff makes you wonder what is the motive behind all this or should I say who side is the author on, is she on unlawfully jailed selfless Daw Suu & the starving millions of Burmese or the brutal repressive regime that don't understand the meaning of altruism but selfishness and corruption.

To me this article is utterly irresponsible and I can see no justification in the author's comment and I certainly feel that Daw Suu and Burmese people who are endeavoring around the world towards freedom and restoration of democracy in Burma deserve a little respect from the author.

The actual fact that the author didn't realize or unwittingly ignore is that it is the United Nation, The West and the so-called friendly neighbors [ when you have friends like these who needs enemy? ] that failing Burma and letting Burmese people down, certainly not Daw Suu who as nothing more to prove what her country and people mean to her.

It is inevitable that we might come across articles like these now and again; however, I haven't a slightest worry as these articles get anywhere as they clearly lack authenticity.

Metta to all,